Denver, Colorado
Real Estate
Information and Helpful Links!
IS THE OFFICE MARKET FINALLY
TURNING AROUND?
Denver's office market decline during the 1980s was the single
most visible symptom of that decade's economic woes. Combined
with severe overbuilding, the energy industry contraction
devastated the metro office market. Things were much changed
during most of the 1990s as Denver's economy expanded and demand
for office space drastically reduced vacancy rates. The amount
of speculative space started, at least until recently, was also
well under control.
However, in 2001 the national economy took a one-two punch with
the high-tech bust and 9/11 once again stunning the office
market, but as the national and local economies begin to
recover, office investors are hoping that glimmer they see is
the light at the end of the tunnel. Employment losses overseas
have gotten big press but were later put in perspective, so
perhaps the office market is finally bouncing off the bottom.
At the end of 2003 Frederick Ross Co. reported a 22.7% office
vacancy rate metro area wide, the highest since 1991 on a total
inventory of some 84 million square feet. The vacancy rate is
somewhat inflated, however, by the inclusion of sublease space.
This type of space may be physically vacant but it is
economically occupied, since the tenant continues to pay rent
even if the space is unused. Of Denver's seven office submarkets,
only two recorded positive net absorption during 2003.
According to Frederick Ross Co. absorption during 2003 totaled
441,000 SF causing vacancy to decrease slightly from 23.2% at
year-end 2002 to 22.7% at year-end 2003 but up from just 9.0% at
the end of 2000. Ross reports that effective median rental rates
declined by about 20%, with greater declines in the northwest
and southeast suburban submarkets. Much of the increase has been
concentrated in new Class A buildings and in formerly single
tenant buildings, especially in the US-36 corridor in the
northwest suburbs and along the I-25 submarket in the southeast.
According to the James Real Estate Services quarterly survey of
office space during 2003 developers completed 14 new office
buildings with a total of 1.7 million SF up slightly from 16
buildings during 2002, containing 1.5 million SF. Most of the
new construction brought online in 2002 was located in the
already-overbuilt northwest, southwest and southeast suburban
submarkets. Most of the 2003 completions are small buildings
dispersed throughout the metro area with the only large
buildings being Legacy Plaza at 285,000 SF in LoDo and Lockton
Center at 125,000 SF in Greenwood Village. Starts were much less
in 2003 at 940,000 SF and 13 projects are under construction
going into 2004 with a total of 965,000 SF again distributed
throughout the metro area. Proposed office buildings total some
1.6 million SF in 17 projects, but many will, of course, be
delayed until the market improves.
During 2001 nearly four million SF of sublease space was brought
onto the market, primarily in the northwest and southeast
suburban submarkets. During 2002 the amount of sublease space
vacant declined slightly to 3.7 million SF. During 2003 the
total amount of sublease space available was down to 2.85
million SF. Sublease space was brought back onto the market due
to mergers, companies going out of business or consolidating
operations into smaller quarters. This phenomenon is
particularly evident in the high tech sector of the local
economy. Some improvement is now evident as companies remove
sublease space from the market, probably in anticipation of
business expansion during the next several years.
The office market in the southeast suburbs and elsewhere is
reminiscent of the 1980s, with a few exceptions. For one, most
tenants are not looking for marquee space. They want an image
that conveys fiscal responsibility. Today's office buildings are
also being built with redundant power, fiber optics, cable
trays, uninterrupted power supplies, and greater air
conditioning volume to diffuse the heat produced by electrical
appliances. Businesses are also pursuing cost savings by packing
their office space more densely with employees, which requires
more flexible floor layouts and more parking spaces; in most
cases, 5 per 1000 SF.
By upgrading the functional elements that tenants need, while
avoiding ostentatious building materials, developers have been
able to keep costs more competitive with existing buildings. In
recent years, new flex and single-story office buildings were
built to meet the demand of tenants leaving the office towers in
search of cheaper rents. The demand for the lower-cost
buildings, which do not have such amenities as elevators and
lobby areas, is expected to grow as the office market recovers.
|